POCO X7 vs. LAVA Agni 3: A Performance Showdown

POCO X7 vs. LAVA Agni 3: A Head-to-Head Performance Showdown
This comparison pits the POCO X7 and LAVA Agni 3 against each other, both vying for the top spot in the sub-$350 price range. Both phones are powered by MediaTek Dimensity 7300 series processors, but with slightly different variants – the POCO X7 uses the Dimensity 7300 Ultra, while the LAVA Agni 3 boasts the Dimensity 7300X. We’ll explore their performance in various benchmarks and real-world tests to see which phone comes out on top. For this comparison, we used the 8GB RAM + 256GB storage variants of both phones.
Benchmark Tests: A Close Race
Several benchmark tests were conducted to objectively compare the phones’ performance. These scores help illustrate the raw processing power and capabilities of the phones. Remember, benchmark results aren’t always perfectly indicative of real-world usage, but they provide a good starting point for comparison.
Geekbench: Measuring CPU Power
Geekbench assesses a phone’s CPU performance, providing both single-core and multi-core scores. A higher score indicates better performance in both basic tasks (single-core) and more demanding tasks (multi-core).
Geekbench 6 | POCO X7 | LAVA Agni 3 |
---|---|---|
Single-core score | 1032 | 1041 |
Multi-core score | 2926 | 3239 |
While both phones use similar processors, the LAVA Agni 3 showed a slightly higher multi-core score (approximately 10% higher). This could be attributed to differences in RAM or storage configuration. However, in everyday use, the difference is unlikely to be noticeable for most users. The overall result is essentially a tie, with neither device showing a clear advantage.
AnTuTu: A Comprehensive Evaluation
AnTuTu offers a more holistic assessment of a phone’s overall performance, considering the CPU, GPU, RAM, and user experience. A higher AnTuTu score signifies better overall performance.
AnTuTu v10 | POCO X7 | LAVA Agni 3 |
---|---|---|
Total Score | 646,751 | 676,483 |
Let’s break down the AnTuTu scores into their components:
AnTuTu Component | POCO X7 | LAVA Agni 3 |
---|---|---|
CPU | 203,890 | 198,021 |
GPU | 144,703 | 151,874 |
Memory | 127,774 | 154,784 |
User Experience (UX) | 170,384 | 171,804 |
Again, the difference is minor. The LAVA Agni 3 edges out the POCO X7 slightly due mostly to a significant advantage in the memory score, likely a result of faster LPDDR5 RAM and UFS 3.1 storage.
CPU Throttle Test: Sustained Performance Under Pressure
Synthetic benchmarks only tell part of the story. A sustained performance test assesses how well a phone maintains performance under prolonged, intensive use. We used a benchmark that stresses the CPU for eight minutes to observe performance degradation.
Test | POCO X7 | LAVA Agni 3 |
---|---|---|
CPU Throttling (%) | 52.1% | 74.6% |
The LAVA Agni 3 significantly outperformed the POCO X7 in this test, retaining a much larger percentage of its peak performance throughout the eight-minute stress test. This suggests that the LAVA Agni 3 might handle demanding tasks over longer periods better than the POCO X7.
Gaming Performance: A Battle of Optimization
Real-world gaming performance is critical for many users. We tested both phones with three popular games: Call of Duty Mobile, Real Racing 3, and BGMI. We monitored average frames per second (FPS) after 30 minutes of gameplay.
Game | Graphics Settings | POCO X7 (FPS) | LAVA Agni 3 (FPS) |
---|---|---|---|
COD Mobile | High Graphics, Max Frames | 55.57 | 54.6 |
Real Racing 3 | Standard | 57.2 | 107.55 |
BGMI | HDR Graphics, Ultra Frames | 35.7 | 36.1 |
The LAVA Agni 3 showed a clear advantage in Real Racing 3, achieving significantly higher FPS. However, in other games, the results were much closer.
Thermal Performance: Staying Cool Under Pressure
We also measured the temperature increase of both phones during the 30-minute gaming sessions.
Game | POCO X7 (°C) | LAVA Agni 3 (°C) |
---|---|---|
COD Mobile | 6.7 | 7.5 |
Real Racing 3 | 5.9 | 5.6 |
BGMI | 6.9 | 7.9 |
The POCO X7 exhibited better thermal management, showing less temperature increase during gaming sessions.
Verdict: Choosing Your Champion
Both phones offer comparable performance at this price point. The LAVA Agni 3 shows slightly better sustained performance, particularly in the CPU throttle test and Real Racing 3 performance. The POCO X7 maintains an edge in thermal management and, potentially, a more consistent gaming experience across different titles.
Ultimately, the "better" phone depends on your priorities. If sustained performance under heavy load is crucial, the LAVA Agni 3 might be the slightly better choice. If cooler operation and a more consistent gaming experience are paramount, POCO X7 is a solid contender. Furthermore, consider features beyond raw performance, like water resistance (POCO X7 offers better IP ratings) or the unique secondary display on the LAVA Agni 3. Your decision should ultimately depend on which features and performance aspects are most important to you.