iPhone 16e Review: What Compromise Are You Willing to Make?

This week, I’ve been reflecting on my experiences with technology as I review the iPhone 16e. Using this phone feels like traveling back in time, especially since I’ve been accustomed to the more advanced iPhone 16 Pro for several months. Switching to the iPhone 16e means adapting to changes, which can be part of any new phone experience. However, with a starting price of $599 and notable missing features, it can be difficult to accept some of these changes.

Apple made certain compromises to keep the iPhone 16e budget-friendly, but some decisions are surprising. For instance, the lack of a second camera and MagSafe charging is unexpected. The iPhone 16e has a 48-megapixel camera but insists on calling it a “2-in-1 camera system,” implying that Apple knows consumers want more than one camera option.

Powered by an A18 chip and the new C1 modem, the iPhone 16e offers decent performance. While reviewing the differences in specifications, it’s essential to consider how those aspects translate into everyday use. I found that the camera limitations stood out most during my experience. I could do without MagSafe and the Dynamic Island feature, but the performance, design, and battery life of the iPhone 16e are commendable.

In terms of design, the iPhone 16e looks like its siblings in the iPhone 16 lineup but may remind users of the older iPhone 14 once the screen is on. The bezels and notch are reminiscent of older designs, although anyone upgrading from a much older model may find this less objectionable. The iPhone 16e features a matte back with a single camera and similar dimensions to its counterparts, making it comfortable to hold and use daily.

The display size of 6.1 inches is an upgrade from previous models, with an OLED panel for brighter, more vibrant viewing. However, it lacks some features found on higher-priced models, such as faster refresh rates and an Always-On Display. Additionally, the iPhone 16e is the last model in Apple’s lineup to have a notch instead of a more modern design that allows for better user interactions.

When testing the camera, I took the iPhone 16e to the Met Museum. I found that both the iPhone 16 and iPhone 16e produced images rich in detail and color. However, the absence of an ultra-wide lens on the 16e posed some challenges; I had to step far back to capture wide scenes, something easily managed by its more expensive siblings.

The camera setup also disappoints in its Portrait mode, only working when it recognizes faces, a limitation not present in previous dual-camera systems. This constraint impacts the quality and versatility of images taken with the iPhone 16e compared to models with multiple lenses.

On a positive note, the iPhone 16e is powered by a strong processor and modem that offer remarkably smooth performance for everyday tasks and gaming. The battery life is impressive too, easily lasting more than a day with regular use.

Comparing the iPhone 16e to other options in the lineup, it notably lacks MagSafe support and some advanced features but does offer USB-C charging and a superior camera system compared to the older iPhone SE. While it is a significant jump from that model, it might fall short for users looking for specific features.

Ultimately, the choice to purchase the iPhone 16e depends on what features are most important to you. If you can skip MagSafe, don’t need an ultra-wide camera, and prioritize budget over high-end specs, the iPhone 16e is a good option. However, for those willing to spend a little more, the iPhone 16 might provide a better overall experience, especially for photography enthusiasts. The iPhone 16e is still a solid, attractive phone for new users or those less concerned with advanced features.